Ukuqaphela uMesiya

---

1. AbaFarisi nabaSadusi beza bemlinga, bamcela ukuba ababonise isibonakaliso esivela ezulwini.

2 Waphendula, wathi kubo: “Kusihlwa nithi: Kuyakuba nokuthula, ngokuba izulu libomvu;

3. Ekuseni, Namuhla kuyoba isiphepho sasebusika, ngokuba izulu libomvu, liguqubele. Bazenzisi! niyakwazi ukwahlukanisa ubuso bezulu, kepha izibonakaliso zesikhathi anikwazi ukuzazi.

4. Isizukulwane esibi nesiphingayo sifuna isibonakaliso, kepha asiyikunikwa sibonakaliso, kuphela isibonakaliso sikaJona umprofethi. Wabashiya wahamba.

---

Esiqeshini esidlule, uJesu wondla abantu abayizinkulungwane ezine ngezinkwa eziyisikhombisa nezinhlanzi ezimbalwa. Leso simangaliso senzeke esiqongweni sentaba ezweni labezizwe. Manje, njengoba lesi siqephu esilandelayo siqala, uJesu usebuyele ezweni lakwa-Israyeli. Isimo sisogwini olusentshonalanga yoLwandle LwaseGalile esifundeni saseMagdala. Kulapha lapho abaholi benkolo bephinda bebhekana khona noJesu. Kulokhu bamcela “isibonakaliso esivela ezulwini” (16:1). Kungenzeka abazazi izimangaliso uJesu azenzile, noma abaqiniseki.

Lokhu kufanekisa okuthile okungenzeka kulowo nalowo kithi. Kuphakathi kokuthi sikhohlwe noma asizazi izindlela ezimangalisayo uNkulunkulu ashintsha ngazo isimo sethu, esikhipha osizini nasekuphelelweni ithemba, ngisho nangaphandle kokushintsha izimo zethu zangaphandle. Nokho, nathi, singahlala singanakile noma singakholwa ngamandla amangalisayo eNkosi okuvuselela izingqondo zethu futhi avuselele imiphefumulo yethu.

Eqaphela ukuthi abaholi benkolo basafuna ukumehlisa isithunzi, uJesu uthi, “Ngokuhlwa nithi: 'Izulu lizolile, ngokuba izulu libomvu.' Futhi ekuseni nithi, 'Namuhla izulu lizoba nesiphepho, ngoba isibhakabhaka sibomvu futhi limnyama.' Bazenzisi. Niyakwazi nokuchaza ubuso bezulu, kepha izibonakaliso zezikhathi anikwazi ukuzichaza.”16:2-3).

Ngala mazwi, uJesu usikisela ukuthi laba baholi benkolo bayakwazi ukubikezela ngokunembile isimo sezulu, kodwa abakwazi ukuqonda okungokoqobo okungokomoya. Kwabonwa kusengaphambili ngabaprofethi, futhi babikezela emibhalweni yabo engcwele, uMesiya wayesefikile futhi manje wayesemi phakathi kwabo impela, kodwa abakwazanga ukukubona. Lesi senzakalo osekunesikhathi silindelwe, esibaluleke kakhulu ukwedlula noma yisiphi isibikezelo sezulu, manje senzeka phambi kwamehlo abo. Nokho, njengoba uJesu asho esahlukweni esandulele, “bangabaholi abayizimpumputhe”15:14). Ngamanye amazwi, bayenqaba ukubona lokho abangafuni ukukubona. Kulokhu, isifiso sabo sobugovu sokuhlala sisemandleni sibavimbela ukuba baqaphele ukuthi uJesu, omi phambi kwabo, uwukugcwaliseka kwesiprofetho sasendulo.

Isimo asifani nesethu. Njengoba sigxile ekukhathazekeni ngezinto ezibonakalayo ngekusasa lethu, sifunda ngezibikezelo zesimo sezulu, izitayela zezombangazwe, nezibikezelo zezimakethe zamasheya, singazi lutho ngezimangaliso eziningi ezenzeka esikhathini samanje. Ngokuphathelene nalokhu, sifana nabaholi benkolo abanekhono lokubikezela isimo sezulu kodwa abangakwazi ukubona uJesu njengoMesiya othenjisiwe. Ukungakwazi kwabo ukubona ngale kokuzibona belungile kuye kwabenza bangaboni iqiniso laphezulu eliphambi kwabo. Nathi, futhi, kwesinye isikhathi asiboni izindlela ezimangalisayo iNkosi esihola ngayo umzuzu nomzuzu, isinika lokho okufanele sikucabange nokuthi yini okufanele sikuzwe ngenkathi ikhuthaza izenzo ezinhle. Ngokwamazwi ombhalo ongcwele, lokhu kuhola okuyimfihlo kubizwa ngokuthi “isinkwa sethu semihla ngemihla.”

Lezi zimpawu ezengeziwe zangaphakathi zokusebenza kukaNkulunkulu akuzona ezifunwa abaholi bezenkolo. Bafuna izibonakaliso zangaphandle, izibonakaliso zamandla amakhulu, izimpawu zokuthi ngempela uJesu uthunywe evela ezulwini. Nokho, uJesu usezenzile izimangaliso eziningi. Nokho, abaholi benkolo basheshe balulaza, balulaza, futhi bazichaza lezo zimangaliso. Isibonelo, ngenkathi uJesu ekhipha amadimoni, abaholi bezenkolo bathi amandla Akhe okwenza lokho ayevela kudeveli (bheka 9:34 futhi 12:24). Ngamanye amazwi, ngenxa yokuthi abaholi benkolo base bezimisele kakade ukubhubhisa uJesu, akusekho okunye angabenzela kona. Asikho isibonakaliso esiyobaqinisekisa ukuthi uJesu unguMesiya ngempela.

Ngaphezu kwalokho, kuphambene nomyalo waphezulu ukukholisa umuntu ngenkani. Nakuba izimpawu nezimangaliso zangaphandle zingaphoqelela ukukholelwa okwesikhashana, uNkulunkulu akaphoqi muntu. Ngamunye wethu ugcinwe enkululekweni ukuze sikhethe ngokukhululekile ukwenqaba noma ukwamukela uJesu. Futhi siyamamukela lapho siphila ngokwezimfundiso Zakhe, sikholelwa ukuthi nguye yedwa ongasinika amandla okwenza lokho. Uma senza lokhu, izimangaliso zangaphakathi ziyokwenzeka nakanjani. Inhliziyo yetshe ingaba inhliziyo yenyama. njengokulotshiweyo emibhalweni yesiHeberu ukuthi: “Ngiyakuninika inhliziyo entsha, ngifake kini umoya omusha; Ngizokhipha inhliziyo yakho yetshe kuwe futhi ngikunike inhliziyo yenyama.”Hezekeli 36:26). ¹

Ngaleso sikhathi siya ngokuya sixhumene neNkosi. Le nqubo ibizwa ngokuthi ukuzalwa kabusha. Ukubeka phansi ukuphila kwethu endala, ukuze sizalwe kabusha ekuphileni okusha. Ayikho enye indlela, futhi akukho “sibonakaliso” sangaphandle esingafakazela leli qiniso elingaphakathi kithi. Njengoba uJesu esho, “Isizukulwane esibi nesiphingayo sifuna isibonakaliso. Kodwa kasiyikunikwa sibonakaliso ngaphandle kwesibonakaliso sikaJona umprofethi.”16:4). ²

Njengoba sesishilo ngaphambili, “isibonakaliso somprofethi uJona” siwukuhlangenwe nakho kwethu ngabanye kokuphindukuzalwa njengoba silwela ukuphila ngokwezimfundiso zenkolo yethu (bona 12:39). Ngezinga esenza ngalo lokhu, siqala ukubona izinguquko ezicashile kodwa ezibalulekile esimilweni sethu—izinguquko ezingatholwa yilabo abalwela ukuphila inkolo yabo kuphela. ³

Njengoba sikhula kusukela ebuntwaneni, ebuntwaneni, ekubeni abantu abadala, izinguquko kancane kancane ekubukekeni kwethu ngokomzimba zibonakala ngokuhamba kwesikhathi. Phakathi naleso sikhathi, izinguquko eziningi ezenzeka esimilweni sethu sangaphakathi, esingokomoya azibonakali kancane. Lezi zinguquko ebuntwini ziphathelene noshintsho ekuqondeni kwethu kanye noshintsho othandweni lwethu njengoba sikhula ngokuhlakanipha futhi nothando ngokwengeziwe. Uma nje siqhubeka sifunda futhi siphikelela ekusebenziseni esikufundayo ekuphileni, isimilo sethu esingokomoya singaqhubeka sikhula ingunaphakade. ⁴

Endleleni, kunezimpawu ezimangalisayo zokuthi intuthuko iyenzeka. Ezinye zazo zingase zihlanganise isifiso esikhulayo sokufunda iqiniso nokulisebenzisa ekuphileni komuntu, ukuzwela okwengeziwe ezidingweni zabanye, isimo sengqondo sokuthethelela, isimo sokubekezela, ukukhululeka okukhulayo ekuvumeni amaphutha, ukujula kokwaneliseka, ukuthamba. inhliziyo, ikhono elikhulayo lokubona ubuhle kwabanye, amazwi okubonga njalo, kanye nekhono elikhulayo lokwamukela imiphumela noma ngabe ivuna thina noma cha. Lezi, nezinye eziningi, “izibonakaliso zikaJona umprofethi” (16:4).

Ekugcineni, inkolo ayiyona into yokukholelwa nje kuphela—kumelwe iphile. Uma silinda ukuba kuqinisekiswe ukufaneleka kwayo nganoma iyiphi enye indlela, isibonelo, ngokulinda izimangaliso zangaphandle, sizolinda ize. Ukube abaholi benkolo babeyilandela ngempela inkolo yabo, bephila ngomoya womthetho kaNkulunkulu hhayi nje incwadi yomthetho, babeyoba nazo zonke izimpawu ababezidinga. Ngokuphila ukuphila okungokomoya okujulile, abaholi benkolo babeyobe sebephenduke baze baqaphela ukuthi uJesu unguMesiya.

Kodwa kwakungenjalo. Babengeke—ngakho-ke babengeke—babone ngale kokubandlulula kwabo kanye nemibono yabo. Ngenxa yalokho, kwakukuncane kakhulu uJesu ayengabenzela kona. Ngakho, “wabashiya, wahamba” (16:4). ⁵

Isicelo esingokoqobo

Ngokwengxenye enkulu, umsebenzi weNkosi wokwenza kabusha uqhubeka ngaphakathi kwethu ngasese, ngaphandle kokuqaphela kwethu. Noma kunjalo, sinikezwa amazwibela ezinzuzo esizizuzile endleleni. Lapho ubhekene nokudumala, ukubambezeleka, ukulahlekelwa, noma ukwehluleka, kukuthatha isikhathi esingakanani ukululama? Njengesicelo esisebenzayo, phawula indlela osabela ngayo lapho izinto zingenzeki ngokushesha obungathanda, noma lapho uphazanyiswa, noma lapho izinhlelo zakho ziphazamisekile. Okokuqala, qaphela futhi umelane nemikhuba yakudala yokukhononda, ukugxeka, nokusola. Khona-ke, khetha ukusabela ngezindlela ezintsha—okungukuthi, ngezindlela ezibonisa imicabango ephakeme nothando olunomusa ngokwengeziwe. Njengoba uqhubeka nokwenza lokhu kuziphatha okungokomoya, wethemba ukuthi iNkosi inawe, qaphela ukuthi ukubekezela kwakho kuqhubeka kanjani kukhula, nokuthi ukwazi ngokushesha kangakanani ukumelana nezimo ezikukhathazayo. Lokhu kuvuka okuncane “kuyizibonakaliso zomprofethi uJona” ezenzeka kuwe. ⁶

Okungaphezu Kokwanele

---

5 Kwathi abafundi bakhe sebewelela ngaphesheya, babekhohliwe ukuphatha izinkwa.

6. UJesu wathi kubo: “Bhekani, nixwaye imvubelo yabaFarisi nabaSadusi.

7 Basebekhulumisana phakathi kwabo, besithi: Ngoba kasithathanga izinkwa.

8 UJesu ekwazi wathi kubo: Nina eninokukholwa okuncane, kungani nizindla phakathi kwenu ngokuthi anithathanga izinkwa na?

9 Anikacabangi yini, futhi anikazikhumbuli izinkwa eziyisihlanu zezinkulungwane eziyisihlanu nokuthi zingaki obhasikidi enazithatha na?

10 Ngisho nezinkwa eziyisikhombisa zezinkulungwane ezine nokuthi zingaki amaqoma enawathatha?

---

Ngemva kokumuka Kwakhe kubaholi bezenkolo, uJesu nabafundi Bakhe bawela ulwandle futhi baya endaweni eqhelile eduze kwaseKhesariya Phillipi, cishe amamayela angamashumi amabili nanhlanu enyakatho yoLwandle LwaseGalile. Njengoba befika kule ndawo entsha, abafundi baqaphela ukuthi bakhohlwe ukuthatha izinkwa. Ephendula, uJesu uthi: “Qaphelani niqaphele imvubelo yabaFarisi nabaSadusi.”16:6). Bedidekile ngamazwi kaJesu, abafundi bayacabanga, “Lokhu kungenxa yokuthi sikhohliwe ukuthatha izinkwa” (16:7). Ekwazi lokho abakucabangayo, uJesu uthi: “O, nina eninokukholwa okuncane, kungani nicabanga ukuthi aninazinkwa na? (16:8).

UJesu ube esebakhumbuza ngezimangaliso ezimbili zangaphambili ezihilela isinkwa. Njengoba uJesu esho, “Anikaqondi namanje? Anizikhumbuli yini izinkwa eziyisihlanu zezinkulungwane eziyisihlanu nokuthi nabutha obhasikidi abangaki na? Noma izinkwa eziyisikhombisa zezinkulungwane ezine nokuthi bangaki obhasikidi abagcwele na? (16:9-10).

Iphuzu likaJesu lilula. Esikhundleni sokuba ngamadoda “okholo oluncane,” kufanele kube amadoda okholo olukhulu. Okungukuthi, kufanele kube amadoda akhumbula konke uJesu abenzele kona, konke uJesu angabenzela khona, nakho konke uJesu azobenzela kona. Uma bengakwenza lokhu, bebengeke bakhathazeke ngokuswelakala kwesinkwa.

Ngokujule nakakhulu, isinkwa senyama sihambisana nokudla okungokomoya, ikakhulukazi uthando olungena ngokungapheli luvela kuNkulunkulu. Ngakho-ke, uma nje siphila ngokwezimfundiso zeNkosi, asisoze saphelelwa isinkwa—okungukuthi, ngeke siphelelwe uthando nokuhlakanipha kukaNkulunkulu. Lokho kungenxa yokuthi ukunikezwa kungaphezu kwalokho esingakusebenzisa, njengoba kuvezwe izingcezu ezisele kubhasikidi. ⁷

Yilokhu futhi okushiwo eMthandazweni WeNkosi lapho sithi, “Siphe namuhla isinkwa sethu semihla ngemihla” (6:11). Ngomqondo womoya, lawa mazwi ayisicelo sokuzithoba sokuthi iNkosi ingasigcwalisa ngalokho okumele sikucabange kanye nalokho okumele sikuzwe ngaso sonke isikhathi, ngisho namanje, naphakade. ⁸

Isicelo esingokoqobo

Lapho abafundi beqaphela ukuthi babekhohliwe ukuletha izinkwa, uJesu wasebenzisa leli thuba njengethuba lokufundisa isifundo esijulile ngokuthembela kuYe. Lapho ekhumbuza abafundi ngezimangaliso ezimbili ezandulele lapho anikeza khona isinkwa esanele ukondla izinkulungwane zabantu, uJesu wayebaqinisekisa ngokuthi akukho okufanele bakhathazeke ngakho uma nje esekhona. Icala liyafana komunye nomunye wethu. Kunezikhathi lapho kungase kube sengathi siphelelwe uthando nozwelo. Mhlawumbe isimo esithile esinzima siye safinyelela umkhawulo, futhi asisakwazi ukubonisa uthando. Lesi yisikhathi sokukhumbula ukuthi uthando lukaNkulunkulu luhlala lutholakala ngobuningi. Usinika lokho okufanele sikucabange nalokho okufanele sikuzwe ngaso sonke isikhathi. Ngakho-ke, njengesicelo esiwusizo, qaphela lezo zikhathi lapho kubonakala sengathi uphelelwe isineke, uphelelwe ukubekezelelana, futhi uphelelwe ububele. Kungenzeka ukuthi uzitshela into enjengokuthi, “Ngeke ngisakwazi ukwenza lokhu” noma “Lokhu kuyangicasula ngempela” noma “Sengifinyelele umkhawulo wami. Akusekho lutho.” Unganqotshwa yile micabango emibi. Kunalokho, khumbula ukuthi iNkosi ikhona ukuze ikunikeze uthando nokuhlakanipha okuningi njengoba ukudinga. Thandazela ukuthi uthando Lwakhe lungene enhliziyweni yakho, wazi ukuthi uyakwazi ukukunikeza konke okudingayo nokunye okwengeziwe.

Imvubelo yabaFarisi nabaSadusi

---

11. Anazi kanjani ukuthi angisho ngesinkwa engithe kini: Xwayani imvubelo yabaFarisi nabaSadusi na?

12. Base beqonda ukuthi wayengashongo ukuthi baxwaye imvubelo yesinkwa, kodwa imfundiso yabaFarisi nabaSadusi.

---

Kungalesi sikhathi lapho uJesu etshela abafundi bakhe ukuthi akakhulumi ngesinkwa senyama. Njengoba uJesu esho, “Aniqondi ngani ukuthi bengingakhulumi kini ngesinkwa, kodwa ukuba nixwaye imvubelo yabaFarisi nabaSadusi na? (16:11). Yilapho-ke beqonda khona incazelo ejulile yamazwi kaJesu. Njengoba kulotshiwe: “Khona baqonda ukuthi wayengasho ukuthi mabaqaphele imvubelo esetshenziswa ezinkwa, kodwa isifundiso sabaFarisi nabaSadusi.”16:12).

Lapho uJesu exwayisa abafundi bakhe ukuba baqaphele imvubelo yabaFarisi nabaSadusi, wayebhekisela ezimfundisweni zamanga nemikhuba yenkolo eyayidlange ngaleso sikhathi. Ngokwesibonelo, abantu babefundiswa ukuba bakholelwe ukuthi izono zabo zingathethelelwa kuphela ngeminikelo yasethempelini. Lokhu kwakuhlanganisa iminikelo eminingi ehlanganisa imihlatshelo yezinkunzi, izinkabi, izimbuzi, izimvu, namajuba. Isibonelo esidume kakhulu yindaba yembuzi yomhlatshelo okwabekwa phezu kwayo izono zabantu ngaphambi kokuba iqhutshelwe ehlane. Lo mcimbi, owaziwa ngokuthi uSuku Lokuhlawulela, noma i-Yom Kippur, wawuthathwa njengomcimbi ongcwele kakhulu onyakeni (bheka Levitikusi 16:8-10).

Nokho, uJesu weza ukuze afundise ukuthi ukuzidela kweqiniso kumayelana nokulahla izimo zengqondo ezingakhi, ukushiya izinkolelo zamanga, ukudedela izifiso eziluthayo, nokulahla imikhuba elimazayo. Embusweni kaNkulunkulu ozayo, lezi kwakuyoba izinhlobo zomnikelo weqiniso. Kulowo mbuso izono zazithethelelwa kuphela ngokuzibonakalisa, ukuzivuma, ukuthandazela amandla okuzifulathela, nokuqala impilo entsha. Umprofethi uMika wabhekisela kulokhu lapho ethi: “Ukubonisile, muntu, okuhle; Futhi uJehova ufunani kuwe? Ukwenza ukulunga, nokuthanda umusa, nokuhamba noNkulunkulu wakho ngokuthobeka.”Mika 6:8). ⁹

AbaFarisi nabaSadusi nabo babefundisa ukuthi ukuziphindiselela nokuziphindiselela kwakunendawo yakho efanele ezindabeni zesintu. Uma nje inani nobukhulu bokuphindisela bekungedluli icala lasekuqaleni, abantu babenelungelo lokuziphindiselela. Njengoba kulotshiwe emibhalweni yesiHebheru ukuthi: “Umuntu olimaza umakhelwane wakhe uyakulimala ngendlela efanayo: ithambo eliphukile ngethambo eliphukile, iso ngeso, izinyo ngezinyo. Njengoba nje alimaze omunye umuntu, kumelwe kwenziwe okufanayo nakuye.”Levitikusi 24:20).

Nokho, uJesu weza ezofundisa isigijimi esihluke kakhulu. Njengoba asho lapho enikeza iNtshumayelo yaseNtabeni, “Nizwile kwathiwa, 'Iso ngeso, izinyo ngezinyo.' Kepha mina ngithi kini: Ningamelani nokubi; Uma umuntu ekumpama esihlathini sokunene, mphendulele nesinye isihlathi…. Thandani izitha zenu, nibabusise abaniqalekisayo, nenze okuhle kwabanizondayo, nibakhulekele abaniphatha kabi, banizingele.”5:38-39; 44).

Njengoba sichazile esahlukweni sesihlanu, “ukuphendula isihlathi” kuyinto esiyenza ngaphakathi lapho izinkolelo zethu zihlaselwa. Nakuba lokhu kuhlasela kungavela ngabanye abantu, kungavela futhi ngamandla kamoya angabonakali azama ukucekela phansi ukholo lwethu kuNkulunkulu futhi alulaze ukuthembela kwethu emandleni eqiniso Lakhe. Ngakho-ke, noma nini lapho siphendulela isihlathi ngaphakathi, sihlala siqinile kulokho esikwaziyo ukuthi kuyiqiniso.

Ezikhathini ezinjalo, siyazi ukuthi awekho amazwi akhulunywayo, amahlebezayo, noma ukunyenyiselwa okungasilimaza noma kucekele phansi ukholo lwethu. Uma nje singavumeli ububi busidonsele empini, singaphansi kwesivikelo sikaNkulunkulu. Uma nje sihlala ebuhleni naseqinisweni leNkosi, ububi abunakusilimaza ngokomoya. Ngakho-ke, akufanele simelane nakho. ¹⁰

Imfundiso yesithathu yamanga, esadlangile nanamuhla, iwumqondo wokuthi uma silalela imiyalo kaNkulunkulu, uyobusisa ukuphila kwethu ngempumelelo yezinto ezibonakalayo, kungakhathaliseki ukuthi impilo engokwenyama, impahla enkulu, noma ukunqoba izitha zethu. Ngezinye izikhathi lo mbono ubizwa ngokuthi “ivangeli lokuchuma,” usekelwe ekuchazeni iBhayibheli ngokwezwi nezwi nezwi nezwi. Njengoba kulotshiwe emiBhalweni yesiHeberu, “Uma nihamba ngezimiso zami, nigcine imiyalo yami, niyenze, ngiyakuninika imvula ngesikhathi sayo, izwe lithele izithelo zalo, nemithi izithelo zayo . . . Niyakudla isinkwa, nisuthe, nihlale ezweni ngokulondeka…. Niyakuxosha izitha zenu, ziwe ngenkemba phambi kwenu.”Levitikusi 26:3-4; 5-8).

Uma zithathwa njengoba zinjalo, izimfundiso ezinjengalezi zisekela umbono wokuthi ingcebo nempilo enhle kuyizimpawu zesibusiso sikaNkulunkulu nokwamukelwa, kuyilapho ubumpofu nokugula kuyizimpawu zesiqalekiso nokulahlwa kukaNkulunkulu. Kodwa uJesu weza ezofundisa umlayezo ohlukile. Njengoba asho eNtshumayelweni Yakhe yaseNtabeni, “Wenza ilanga Lakhe liphumele ababi nabahle, futhi unisa imvula phezu kwabalungileyo naphezu kwabangalungile.”5:45).

Ngamanye amazwi, uNkulunkulu uthanda bonke ngokulinganayo nangesilinganiso esilinganayo. Uthando lwakhe, olumelelwa yilanga, lutholakala kuwo wonke umuntu ngaso sonke isikhathi, kungakhathaliseki ukuthi muhle noma mubi. Futhi iqiniso laKhe litholakala ngokulinganayo kubo bonke, njengoba imvula inela kwabalungileyo nabangalungile. Uma singalutholi uthando lukaNkulunkulu neqiniso, kungenxa yokuthi sihlubuke kuNkulunkulu, hhayi ngoba uNkulunkulu usifulathele. Uma sikhetha ukuphila impilo ephambene nentando Yakhe—okungukuthi, impilo engakwazi ukuthola lokho uNkulunkulu ahlala efisa ukusinika kona—ngeke sikwazi ukuthola izibusiso zangempela zasezulwini. Lezi zibusiso azikho ngengcebo, ukunqoba izitha zemvelo, noma ukuchuma ngokomzimba. Kunalokho, ziphathelene nengcebo yeqiniso elingokomoya, ukunqoba izitha ezingokomoya, nokuthula okuba khona lapho sithembela kuNkulunkulu.

Lezi ngezinye zezimfundiso zamanga zabaFarisi nabaSadusi. Singase futhi sikhulume ngezimfundiso zabo ezingamanga mayelana nolaka lukaNkulunkulu, ukukhathalela kwabo umbhalo womthetho kunomoya wawo, umqondo wokuthi babengabantu abakhethiwe kuyilapho bonke abanye bedelelwa, nokuphikelela kwabo kokuthi uJesu wayengumuntu oyingozi. kunoMesiya uqobo lwaKhe. Konke lokhu, nokunye okuningi, kwakuphakathi kwezimfundiso zamanga zabaFarisi nabaSadusi.

Ngaphandle kwezimfundiso zabo zamanga, uJesu wayenokuningi ayekusho ngesimo sengqondo sokuzidla, sokwedelela sabaholi benkolo. Lapho bekhononda ngokuthi abafundi bakaJesu abazange bageze izandla zabo ngaphambi kokuba badle, uJesu wababiza ngokuthi bangabazenzisi abadumisa uNkulunkulu ngezindebe zabo kuyilapho izinhliziyo zabo zikude Naye (bheka. 15:8). UJesu wabe esethi: “Akukhona okungena emlonyeni okungcolisa umuntu, kodwa okuphuma emlonyeni. Yilokhu okungcolisa umuntu” (15:11).

Lezi zixwayiso ezingaphelelwa isikhathi azigcini nje ngokuphathelene nabaholi benkolo, futhi akuzona nje ezabafundi bakaJesu. Ezawo wonke umuntu. Lokhu kungenxa yokuthi abaholi bezenkolo bamele izimo zengqondo nokuziphatha sonke esingawela kukho. Noma nini lapho sizizwa sidelela abanye, sizizwa siphakeme ngandlela-thile, noma sikholelwa ukuthi abanye kufanele bacabange ngendlela esenza ngayo futhi siziphathe ngendlela esibheka ngayo njengabalungile, sisuke futhi sizitika ‘ngemvubelo yabaFarisi nabaSadusi. .” Le “mvubelo” uJesu asitshela ukuba “siyiqaphele” ingasigcwalisa ngasese ukuzethemba kwethu kunokuthembela kuNkulunkulu, isivuthele imizwa yokuzidla, futhi isikhohlise ekucabangeni ukuthi siphakeme kunabanye.

Ngakho-ke, empeleni, uJesu wayengakhulumi nabafundi Bakhe ngesinkwa senyama. Kunalokho, wayekhuluma ngezimfundiso ezidukisayo nesimo sengqondo sokuzidla sabaFarisi nabaSadusi. Uma abafundi bebelandela izimfundiso nezimo zengqondo zabaFarisi nabaSadusi, bonke “abavutshelwe” ngokuzidla nokudelela, bebeyoduka ngokudabukisayo. ¹¹

Isicelo esingokoqobo

Isixwayiso sikaJesu ngemvubelo yabaFarisi nabaSadusi asisona isixwayiso ngesinkwa esingokoqobo. Kunalokho, kuyisixwayiso ngezinkolelo ezingamanga. Lokhu kuhlanganisa izimfundiso ezingamanga ngobunjalo bukaNkulunkulu, izimfundiso ezidukisayo mayelana nencazelo yokuchuma ngokwezinto ezibonakalayo, nemibono eyiphutha ngendlela izono ezithethelelwa ngayo. Ngokujule ngokwengeziwe, kudingeka futhi sicabangele amathonya esihogo ageleza ezingqondweni zethu ukuze ahlanekezele indlela esibona ngayo izinto. Ngokwesibonelo, la mathonya esihogo angase azame ukusigcina sigxile entweni eyodwa embi kunokuba sithathe isithombe esikhulu. Bangase basikhumbuze iphutha esalenza esikhathini esidlule futhi bakwenze kubonakale sengathi iphutha elilodwa liye lachaza ukuphila kwethu konke. Bangase babambe impikiswano eyodwa, noma igama elilodwa elingakhulunywanga kahle, futhi balikhiphe ngokulingana, balisuse iphutha elincane libe inhlekelele enkulu. Njengemvubelo, inkumbulo embi, umbono ongamanga, ukukhathazeka, noma ukwesaba kungasakazeka ezingqondweni zethu. Kungaba ukuthatheka okudla konke okonakalise isinkwa sonke. Lawa mathonya onakalisayo angaveza izizathu nezizathu ezisigcina sivalelwe entukuthelweni, ekweyisayo, noma ekuzidabukeleni. Ngakho-ke, njengesicelo esiwusizo, qaphela lolu hlobo lwemvubelo. Phawula ukuthi umcabango owodwa, uma uvunyelwe ukuba ungene, ungonakalisa kanjani sonke isinkwa—okungukuthi, ukugcwalisa ingqondo yakho yonke ngemibono engamanga nemizwelo engemihle. Njengekhambi, lalela isixwayiso sikaJesu, “Qaphelani imvubelo yabaFarisi nabaSadusi.”

Isivumo Sokholo SikaPetru

---

13. Kwathi uJesu esefikile emaphandleni aseKesariya Filiphu, wancenga abafundi bakhe, wathi: “Abantu bathi mina iNdodana yomuntu ngingubani na?

14 Basebesithi: Abanye bathi uJohane uMbhabhathizi; abanye ngu-Eliya; abanye uJeremiya, noma omunye wabaprofethi.

15 Wathi kubo: “Kepha nina nithi ngingubani na?

16 USimoni Petru waphendula wathi: “Wena unguKristu, iNdodana kaNkulunkulu ophilayo.”

17 UJesu waphendula, wathi kuye: “Ubusisiwe wena Simoni kaJona, ngokuba inyama negazi akukwambulelanga lokhu, kodwa uBaba osezulwini.

18. Nami ngithi kuwe: Wena unguPetru, phezu kwaleli dwala ngiyakulakha ibandla lami, namasango esihogo awayikulahlula.

19. Futhi ngiyakukunika izihluthulelo zombuso wezulu, futhi konke oyakubopha emhlabeni kuyoba kuboshiwe emazulwini; futhi konke oyakukhulula emhlabeni koba kukhululiwe nasezulwini.”

20. Wabayala abafundi bakhe ukuba bangatsheli muntu ukuthi unguJesu Kristu.

---

Esigabeni esidlule, uJesu waxwayisa abafundi bakhe ukuba baqaphele imvubelo yabaFarisi nabaSadusi. Sathi le mvubelo imelela izimfundiso zamanga, imikhuba nezimo zengqondo zabaholi benkolo. Nokho, kufanele kuphawulwe ukuthi imvubelo ingaba usizo. Lokhu kungenxa yokuthi iqala inqubo yokuvubela lapho ukungcola kuhlukaniswa khona futhi kulahlwe. Njengoba nje isinkwa sikhuphuka ngale nqubo, nathi, singakhuphukela emazingeni aphezulu. Njengoba uJesu asho ngaphambili kulelivangeli, “Umbuso wezulu ufana nemvubelo ayithatha owesifazane, wayifaka ezilinganisweni ezintathu zempuphu, yaze yabila yonke.”13:33).

Ngaleso sikhathi, sabonisa ukuthi imvubelo ifana nalokho okwenzeka kithi phakathi nezikhathi ezilingayo ezingokomoya. Imvubelo eyathathwa owesifazane wayifihla ezilinganisweni ezintathu zempuphu imelela ukuhlanjululwa kothando, imicabango, nezenzo zethu ngenqubo yokuvutshelwa okungokomoya. Njengoba kungekho ukuzalwa kabusha ngaphandle kwesilingo, le nqubo yokuvutshelwa iyisigaba esibalulekile ekukhuleni kwethu ngokomoya. ¹²

Nokho, ukuze sinqobe ezimpini zezilingo, sidinga ukwazi ukuthi lezi zimpi ziyeza, ezingenakugwema, nokuthi kukhona amaqiniso kamoya okubhekana nazo. Kuwo wonke amaqiniso akhona ukuze adlule ngempumelelo kulezi zikhathi zokulingwa kukamoya, iqiniso elilodwa, ngaphezu kwakho konke, elidingekayo. Lesi siqephu esilandelayo simayelana naleli qiniso eliyisisekelo. ¹³

Njengoba lesi senzakalo siqala, uJesu nabafundi bakhe basemagqumeni eNtaba iHermoni, esifundeni saseKesariya Filipi. Kulapho uJesu athi kubafundi bakhe: “Abantu bathi mina, iNdodana yomuntu, ngingubani na? (16:13). Bebika lokho abakuzwile abanye, baphendula bathi: “Abanye bathi uJohane uMbhapathizi, abanye u-Eliya, abanye bathi uJeremiya noma omunye wabaprofethi.”16:14). Lokhu, vele, kuyinzwabethi—imibono yabanye, inhlebo namahemuhemu ayehamba ngaleso sikhathi. Ngakho-ke, uJesu uthi, “Kepha nina nithi ngingubani na? (16:15).

Ngaphandle kokungabaza nakancane, uPetru uthi, “Wena unguKristu, iNdodana kaNkulunkulu ophilayo” (16:16).

Ngala mazwi, uPetru uvuma ukuthi ngempela uJesu unguMesiya okwase kuyisikhathi eside elindelwe, lowo othenjisiwe okwakhulunywa ngaye abaprofethi. Njengoba kulotshiwe emiBhalweni yesiHeberu, “UNkulunkulu wezulu uyomisa umbuso ongasoze wachithwa . . . Uyochoboza yonke eminye imibuso, wona uqobo ume phakade.”Daniyeli 2:44). Ngomqondo ongokoqobo, la mazwi abhekisela ekufikeni kwenkosi enkulu nenamandla ezoholela abantu bayo ekunqobeni zonke izitha zemvelo. Lesi senzakalo okwase kuyisikhathi eside silindelwe sabizwa ngokuthi ‘ukuza kukaMesiya.

Isiqu esithi “Mesiya” yigama lesiHeberu elisho “ogcotshiweyo.” Ngokuvamile, libhekisela ekubusisweni nguNkulunkulu ngesipho esikhethekile noma ubizo, njengalapho kuthiwa umuntu “ugcotshiwe” ukushumayela, noma ukuphulukisa, noma ukuhola. Ezikhathini zeBhayibheli, amakhosi ayegcotshwa ngamafutha ekugcotshweni kwawo ukuze abonise ukuthi ukubekwa kwawo akuveli kubantu kodwa kuNkulunkulu. NgesiGreki, igama elithi “ogcotshiweyo” lithi Christos [χριστός], okusho ukuthi “uKristu.” Ngakho-ke, lapho uPetru ethi, “Wena unguKristu,” ubhekisela kuJesu njengoMesiya othenjisiwe, “ogcotshiweyo,” oyoba umbusi wazo zonke izizwe nayo yonke imibuso—iNkosi yamakhosi.

Lapho uPetru ethi uJesu unguKristu, iNdodana kaNkulunkulu ophilayo, uJesu unikeza isiqinisekiso esinamandla sokuvuma kukaPetru. UJesu wathi: “Ubusisiwe wena, Simoni Bar-Jona, ngokuba inyama negazi akukwambulelanga lokhu, kodwa uBaba osezulwini.”16:17). Ngenxa yokuthi uPetru waphendula kahle, uJesu uthi: “Wena unguPetru, phezu kwaleli dwala ngizokwakha ibandla Lami, futhi amasango esihogo ngeke alehlule.”16:18).

Ngamafuphi, uJesu uthi ukuqashelwa kobunkulunkulu Bakhe kuyitshe legumbi lapho wonke amanye amaqiniso eyohlala phezu kwawo. ‘Yidwala’ okuyokwakhiwa phezu kwalo konke okunye okunokholo. KuPetru, nakulowo nalowo kithi, lokhu kuyimfundiso eyisisekelo okufanele siyikhumbule njengoba sidlula ekulweni kwethu nezilingo. Kuwukuba nokholo oluphilayo ebunkulunkulwini bukaJesu Kristu. ¹⁴

Lapho uJesu ephetha iNtshumayelo yaseNtabeni, wabhekisela nakuleli qiniso elikhulu, kodwa akazange acacise ukuthi lalisho ukuthini. Kwakuyindaba yendoda eyakha indlu yayo phezu kwedwala. Njengoba uJesu asho ngalesosikhathi, “Lana imvula, kwafika izikhukhula, kwavunguza imimoya, yayishaya kuleyondlu; futhi ayizange iwe, ngoba yayisekelwe phezu kwedwala.”7:25).

Manje, njengoba uJesu elungiselela abafundi Bakhe ukulwa nezilingo, wembula ukwaziswa okwengeziwe ngohlobo lwedwala abafundi okuyodingeka bame kulo njengoba belungiselela ukuzivikela imvubelo yabaFarisi nabaSadusi. Leli dwala liwukuvuma ukuthi uJesu ‘unguKristu, iNdodana kaNkulunkulu ophilayo. Leli qiniso linamandla kangangokuthi “amasango eHayidese awayikulahlula” (16:18).

Nokho, kufanele kuphawulwe ukuthi nakuba uPetru ebhekisela kuJesu njengoKristu, iNdodana kaNkulunkulu ophilayo, akasho ukuthi uJesu unguNkulunkulu uqobo Lwakhe. Okwamanje, lokhu kwanele. UJesu utshela uPetru ukuthi lokhu kuqonda kokuqala kuzovula umnyango wamaqiniso ajulile, ngoba kuyisihluthulelo sombuso wezulu. Njengoba uJesu esho, “ngiyokunika izihluthulelo zombuso wezulu, futhi noma yini oyoyibopha emhlabeni iyobe kuboshiwe nasezulwini, futhi noma yini oyikhulula emhlabeni iyobe ikhululiwe nasezulwini.”16:19).

Nakuba lesi siqephu ngokuvamile siqondwa ngokuthi sisho ukuthi uPetru uyokwazi ngempela ukuvula nokuvala amasango ezulu, kunencazelo ejulile, yendawo yonke. Akukona ngoPetru emi kulokho abanye abakubiza ngokuthi “amasango amaparele” enquma ukuthi uyasingenisa noma cha ezulwini. Kunalokho, kumayelana namaqiniso kamoya esiwanikezwa eZwini leNkosi. Noma nini lapho la maqiniso efakwa engqondweni, ethandwa, futhi ephila, aba “izihluthulelo” ezivala umnyango wesihogo—angavumeli lutho olubi noma amanga ukuba lungene ezingqondweni zethu.

Ngesikhathi esifanayo, lezi zihluthulelo zingavula umnyango wezulu, zivumele konke okuhle nokuyiqiniso kugeleze phakathi. Noma yini elimaza umoya wethu 'iyoboshwa'; futhi noma yini ethuthukisa ukuphila komoya wethu “iyothukululwa.” Futhi “isihluthulelo sezihluthulelo,” idwala leqiniso ami phezu kwalo wonke amanye amaqiniso, siwukuvuma ukuthi uJesu ‘unguKristu, iNdodana kaNkulunkulu ophilayo. ¹⁵

Isicelo esingokoqobo

Lesi yisikhathi sokuqala lapho uJesu eziveza khona kubafundi Bakhe ‘njengoKristu, iNdodana kaNkulunkulu ophilayo. Nakuba uJesu engakasho lokhu ngokwakhe, uqinisekisa isivumo sikaPetru ngokuthi kuye, “Inyama negazi akukwambulelanga lokhu, kodwa uBaba osezulwini.” Ngamanye amazwi, kukhona ezinye izinto ezedlula indlela yokucabanga yomuntu esekelwe nje ebufakazini bezinzwa. Lezi yizinto ‘ezingembulelwa nguBaba wethu osezulwini’ kuphela. Lokhu kubhekise ohlotsheni lwesambulo eseqa imfundiso yabaFarisi nabaSadusi. Ngakho-ke, njengokusebenza okuwusizo, cabangela umehluko phakathi kokubona uJesu njengomuntu nje, njengoba kwenza abaFarisi nabaSadusi, ‘njengoKristu, iNdodana kaNkulunkulu ophilayo,’ njengoba kwenza uPetru. Vumela umqondo wobunkulunkulu bukaJesu ukuba ube nomthelela endleleni ofunda ngayo amazwi Akhe futhi ubuke izenzo Zakhe. Ngezinga ovuma ngalo ubunkulunkulu bukaJesu, amazwi Akhe azothatha amandla andayo empilweni yakho. Njengoba kulotshiwe emiBhalweni yesiHeberu, “Wathumela izwi lakhe, wabaphulukisa, wabakhulula ekubhujisweni” (AmaHubo 107:20). Futhi, “Amazwi akho aba intokozo kimi, nentokozo yenhliziyo yami” (Jeremiya 15:16).

Indlela Yesiphambano

---

21 Kusukela lapho uJesu waqala ukubonisa abafundi bakhe ukuthi umelwe ukuya eJerusalema, ahlushwe ngokuningi ngamalunga nabapristi abakhulu nababhali, abulawe, avuswe ngosuku lwesithathu.

22 UPetru wamthatha, waqala ukumkhuza, ethi: “Zihawukele, Nkosi; lokhu akuyikubakho kuwe.”

23 Kodwa waphenduka wathi kuPetro: Suka emva kwami, Sathane; uyisikhubekiso kimi, ngokuba awuhlakaniphile okukaNkulunkulu, kodwa okwabantu.”

24 UJesu wayesethi kubafundi bakhe: “Uma umuntu ethanda ukungilandela, makazidele, athabathe isiphambano sakhe, angilandele.

25. Ngokuba yilowo nalowo othanda ukusindisa umphefumulo wakhe, uyakulahlekelwa yikho, kepha olahlekelwa ngumphefumulo wakhe ngenxa yami uyakuwufumana.

26 Umuntu anganikela ngani kube yisihlengo somphefumulo wakhe?

27 Ngoba iNdodana yomuntu izakuza ngenkazimulo kaYise kanye lezingilosi zayo; khona izabuyisela kulowo lalowo njengokwenza kwakhe.

28. Ngiqinisile ngithi kini: Bakhona abanye kwabemi lapha, abangayikuzwa ukufa, baze bayibone iNdodana yomuntu iza embusweni wayo.

---

UJesu ubelokhu elungiselela abafundi bakhe kancane kancane izilingo ezingenakugwenywa abazobhekana nazo. Kulesi siqephu esilandelayo, uqala ukukhuluma ngokusobala ngezilingo Zakhe kanye nokuhlupheka Yena mathupha asezokubekezelela. Njengoba kulotshiwe, “Kusukela ngaleso sikhathi uJesu waqala ukubonisa abafundi bakhe ukuthi umelwe ukuya eJerusalema futhi ahlushwe ngokuningi ... futhi abulawe … futhi avuswe ngosuku lwesithathu”16:21).

UPetru akakuthathi kahle. Nakuba engowokuqala kubafundi ukuvuma ubunkulunkulu bukaJesu, akakwazi ukuthwala umcabango wokuthi kufanele uJesu ahlupheke futhi afe. Ngakho-ke, uPetru uyamemeza, “Makube kude nawe, Nkosi; lokhu akusoze kwenzeka kuwe” (16:22).

Njengabanye abafundi, uPetru ulazisa ithemba lokuthi ngokushesha uJesu uzoba umlweli wabo omkhulu futhi abaholele ekunqobeni zonke izitha zabo zemvelo. Bebelokhu bebheke phambili osukwini lapho uJesu eyozibeka khona njengenkosi efanelekayo, uMesiya osekukade elindelwe oyokhulula abantu baKhe futhi abe umbusi wazo zonke izizwe. Kungenzeka ukuthi babejwayelene nesiprofetho esilotshwe kuDaniyeli. Njengoba kulotshiwe ukuthi: “Embonweni wami ebusuku ngabona, bheka, phambi kwami kwakukhona onjengendodana yomuntu iza namafu ezulu. . . . Yanikwa ukubusa, nenkazimulo, nombuso, ukuze bonke abantu, nezizwe, nezilimi bayikhonze. Umbuso wakhe umi phakade naphakade, nombuso wakhe awuyikuchithwa naphakade.”Daniyeli 7:13-14).

Kulula ukucabanga ukuthi kungenzeka ukuthi uPetru ucabanga ngemivuzo yasemhlabeni kunemivuzo yasezulwini. Bekungaba ngokwemvelo ngaye ukuba namathemba aphakeme ngalombuso omusha nokhazimulayo, uJesu eyinkosi. Okungenani, kwakuyoba ukuphela kokubusa kwamaRoma, nesiqalo esisha kubantu bakwa-Israyeli. Kungase kube nendawo ekhethekile kaPetru embusweni omusha.

Kodwa lokhu kuwukungaqondi injongo yangempela yokuphila kukaJesu emhlabeni. Umgomo wangempela womsebenzi kaJesu uwukunqoba nokunqoba izitha ezingokomoya, hhayi ezemvelo. Phela, ivangeli liqala ngesiphrofetho esithi, “Uyosindisa abantu bakhe ezonweni zabo”—hhayi kubacindezeli babo benyama (bona 1:21).

Lolu uhlobo olusha nolwehlukile lwensindiso, oluhluke kakhulu kulokho okwakulindelwe kuMesiya. Lolu hlobo lwensindiso lungafezwa kuphela ngokulwa kukaJesu nabo bonke ububi obungake buhlasele isintu. Ukuphika isidingo salenqubo, ukucabanga ukuthi kukhona enye indlela, elula, ukuphika yona kanye inhloso yokufika kweNkosi. Ngakho, lapho uPetru ethi kuJesu, “Lokhu ngeke kwenzeke kuwe, Nkosi,” kufana nokuphika lenqubo ebalulekile. Ngakho-ke, uJesu uthi kuPetru, “Suka emva kwami, Sathane; Uyisikhubekiso kimi, ngokuba awuqondi okukaNkulunkulu, kodwa okwabantu.”16:23).

Kungokwemvelo ukukhetha indlela elula, engenamsebenzi. Kodwa ngaphandle kwezilingo ezingokomoya nokulwa, akukho ukukhula okungokomoya. Lokhu ngezinye izikhathi kubizwa ngokuthi, "Indlela Yesiphambano." Kubo bobabili uJesu nakubalandeli Bakhe, isilingo esingokomoya sasingenakugwenywa. Ngakho-ke, uJesu uthi, “Uma umuntu ethanda ukungilandela, makazidele, athabathe isiphambano sakhe, angilandele. Ngokuba yilowo nalowo othanda ukusindisa ukuphila kwakhe uyakulahlekelwa yikho, kepha olahlekelwa ngukuphila kwakhe ngenxa yami uyakukufumana. Ngokuba kuyakumsizani umuntu, uma ezuza izwe lonke, kodwa alahlekelwe ukuphila kwakhe na? Kumbe umuntu anganikela ngani ukuze ahlenge umphefumulo wakhe?” (16:24-26). ¹⁶

Noma ngabe lezi zindaba zingajabulisi noma zingamukeleki kangakanani, yilokhu abafundi okudingeka bakuzwe ngalesi sikhathi ekukhuleni kwabo ngokomoya. UJesu ukwenza kucace kubo ukuthi isilingo akufanele sigwenywe. Kufanele sikhumbule ukuthi uPetru uthathe isinyathelo sokuqala sokuba umKristu weqiniso. Uvumile ukuthi uJesu unguKristu, iNdodana kaNkulunkulu ophilayo. Kodwa ukuze enze lesi sivumo sokholo sibe ngokoqobo, kumelwe, kusukela manje kuqhubeke, alwele ukuthola imivuzo yasezulwini, hhayi nje esemhlabeni. Kumelwe azimisele ngisho nokubeka phansi intando yakhe endala ngaphambi kokuba athole incwadi yefa entsha. Lena incazelo ejulile yamazwi kaJesu, “Yilowo nalowo ofuna ukusindisa ukuphila kwakhe uyolahlekelwa yikho, futhi noma ubani olahlekelwa ukuphila kwakhe ngenxa Yami uyokuthola” ( Joh.16:25). ¹⁷

UJesu ube esenezela isithembiso esikhulu kanye nesiqiniseko sokuthi umbuso Wakhe uyeza maduze. Uthi: “Ngokuba iNdodana yomuntu iyakuza ngenkazimulo kaYise kanye nezingelosi zayo, khona-ke iyovuza yilowo nalowo ngokwemisebenzi yakhe. Ngiqinisile ngithi kini: Bakhona abanye kwabemi lapha abangayikukuzwa ukufa, baze babone iNdodana yomuntu iza embusweni wayo.”16:27-28).

Kubafundi, abawaqondayo la mazwi ngokwezwi nezwi, uJesu ubonakala ethi usezomisa umbuso Wakhe wenyama, nokuthi kuzokwenzeka ngesikhathi sokuphila kwabo. Ngamanye amazwi, ngaphambi kokuba bafe, noma “banambitha ukufa,” uJesu uyomisa umbuso Wakhe omusha. Kodwa uJesu ukhuluma ngokunye okungaphakathi. Ukhuluma ngendlela umbuso wasezulwini ongamiswa ngayo komunye nomunye wethu, ngisho namanje ngaphambi kokuba sikunambithe ukufa kwenyama.

Ukusungulwa kwalowo mbuso kuqala ngesinqumo sokusebenzisa amandla ethu esiwanikwe nguNkulunkulu ukuphakamisa izingqondo zethu ngaphezu kwezinga lemvelo lempilo yethu ukuze siqonde imithetho yeqiniso likamoya. Leli khono, elifakwe kuwo wonke umuntu kusukela endalweni, lisenza sikwazi ukuvula amehlo ethu angokomoya ukuze sibone futhi siqonde iqiniso laphezulu ekuphileni kwethu.

Noma nini lapho sisebenzisa leli khono, siphakamisa ukuqonda kwethu ngaphezu kwezinto ezibonakalayo, siba nokuqonda okusha. Zonke izinto sizibona ekukhanyeni okukhanyayo kweqiniso eliphakeme. Yilo mbono ongaphakathi nakakhulu uJesu akhuluma ngawo lapho ethi: “Bakhona abanye kwabemi lapha abangayikuzwa ngempela ukufa baze babone iNdodana yomuntu iza embusweni wayo.”16:28). ¹⁸

Isicelo esingokoqobo

Isithembiso sikaJesu sokuthi abanye abantu ngeke “banambitha ukufa” baze bambone eza embusweni Wakhe sibonakala sisho ukuthi maduze uzomisa umbuso Wakhe wasemhlabeni. Ngamanye amazwi, lokhu kuzokwenzeka phakathi nokuphila kwabo. Uma kuqondwa ngokujule, kusho ukuthi uJesu umisa umbuso Wakhe njengamanje, ngaphakathi komunye nomunye wethu. Ngakho-ke, njengesenzo esingokoqobo, vula indawo yokumiswa kwalowo mbuso enhliziyweni yakho. Qala ngokufunda imithetho yalowombuso njengoba ifundiswa eZwini. Khona-ke phila ngokuvumelana naleyo mithetho ngokuvumela intando kaNkulunkulu ukuba yenziwe kuwe futhi isebenze ngawe. Njengosizo ekusizeni iNkosi ukuthi imise umbuso Wayo kuwe, zindla ngamazwi Awanikeza abafundi Bakhe lapho ebafundisa ukuthi bathandaze kanjani. Gxila kakhulu emazwini athi, “Umbuso wakho mawufike, intando yakho mayenziwe” (6:10).

Footnotes:

814. Verse 11. And I saw another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.

11. "And I saw another beast coming up out of the earth," signifies confirmations from the sense of the letter of the Word in favor of faith separated from life, and the consequent falsifications of the truth of the church n. 815; "and he had two horns like a lamb," signifies the power as if from the Lord of persuading that there is a conjunction with the Word of faith separate n. 816; "and he spake as a dragon," signifies with a similar affection, thought, doctrine, and preaching, as belong to those who separate faith from the life of faith, which is charity n. 817.

817. And he spake as a dragon, signifies with a similar affection, thought, doctrine, and preaching, as belong to those who separate faith from the life of faith, which is charity. This is evident from the signification of "speaking," as being affection, thought, doctrine, and preaching. This is the signification of "speaking" because all the speech of man is from affection and the consequent thought. The affection itself is expressed by the sound of the speech, and the thought by its words. The affection and the thought are both of them in the speech, as everyone who reflects can see. The affection alone by itself cannot speak, it can only make a sound and sing; nor can thought alone by itself speak otherwise than as an automaton without life, since it is the affection that gives life to every expression of speech; and this is why a man is regarded by others according to the affection of his speech and not according to the words he utters. "To speak" signifies also to preach from doctrine, thus doctrine and preaching therefrom, because it is said that the beast "spake as a dragon;" and a "dragon" means those who are in faith separated from charity both in doctrine and in life (See above, n. 711, 714); and this beast means confirmations from the sense of the letter of the Word in favor of the separation of faith from life, and the resulting falsifications of the Word; consequently "to speak as a dragon" signifies that kind of religion in respect to doctrine and preaching.

[2] As faith separate from charity and the resulting falsification of the Word are described by the dragon and its two beasts, I will show in this article that a like heresy is depicted in the Word by "Cain," by "Reuben," and by the "Philistines," and the like is meant also by the "he-goat" in Daniel. For there have been several churches on this earth, namely, the Most Ancient, which was before the flood; the Ancient, which was after the flood; the Jewish, which followed the Ancient; and lastly the Christian Church. All of these churches degenerated in process of time into two enormous errors, into one which adulterated all the goods of the church, and into the other which falsified all its truths. The church that adulterated all the goods of the church is described in the Word by the "Babylonians and Chaldeans;" and the church that falsified all the truths of the church is described by "Cain," by "Reuben," and by the "Philistines," and by the "he-goat" in Daniel which fought with the ram and overcame it. The adulteration of the good of the church, which is described by the "Babylonians and Chaldeans," will be spoken of hereafter where "Babylon" is treated of in Revelation; but now the falsification of truth shall be treated of, which is described here in Revelation by "the dragon and his two beasts," and was also described by "Cain," and by the others above mentioned.

[3] That those who separate the knowledges of truth and good from a life according to them, and who believe that they may be saved by these alone, were represented by "Cain," has been briefly shown in the Arcana Coelestia where Cain and Abel are treated of; to which this shall be added. It is written of Cain:

That he was the firstborn of Adam, and that he tilled the ground, and brought of the fruit of the ground an offering to Jehovah; and that Abel was a shepherd of the flock, and brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof; also that Jehovah had respect unto the offering of Abel and not unto the offering of Cain, that therefore Cain's anger was kindled and he slew his brother; and that Cain was therefore accursed and rejected from the ground, and became a wanderer and fugitive in the earth; and that Jehovah set a sign upon Cain lest he should be slain, and decreed that whoever should slay him should have vengeance taken on him sevenfold (See Genesis 4).

It is to be known that all names of persons and places in the Word signify things and states of the church, especially the names in the first chapters of Genesis, because the stories in those chapters are made-up histories containing the deepest arcana of heaven, and yet they are most holy in the sense of the letter, because in every least word there is a spiritual sense that conjoins the heavens with the men of the church. What these stories involve in the spiritual sense and what the names of the persons there signify has been explained in the Arcana Coelestia. "Cain" signifies the knowledges of truth and good separated from a life according to them, thus from heavenly love, and "Abel" signifies heavenly love; or what is the same, "Cain" signifies truth separated from good, and "Abel" good conjoined with truth. And as truth is the first thing of the church, since every church is formed by means of truths, because every church begins from truths or from the knowledges of truth and good, therefore Cain was the firstborn, and was named "man" [vir] of Jehovah," "man of Jehovah" signifying in the Word the truth of heaven and the church; and the "ground" which Cain tilled signifies the church. The separation of truth from good is signified by the murder of Abel by Cain; for when everything of the church is placed in truths or in knowledges, and not in goods or in the affection of living according to truths, good with its affections is slain. And as everything of the church perishes when truth is separated from good, so Cain "was cast forth from the ground," which, as has been said, signifies the church. But because truths are the first things of the church, for life must be learned from truths, "a sign was set on Cain, lest someone should slay him; and it was decreed that if anyone should slay him he should be avenged seven-fold." And because truth without good is carried hither and thither, having nothing to lead it, and consequently falls successively into falsities, and departs from the way that leads to heaven, so Cain "was cast forth from the face of Jehovah, and became a wanderer and fugitive." The like is true of faith and charity, since faith is of truth and charity is of good; so when faith is separated from charity what is said of Cain takes place, namely, that "it kills Abel its brother," which is charity, and in consequence the church perishes, which is signified by "being cast forth from the ground, and becoming a wanderer and fugitive," for when faith is separated from charity truth is successively turned into falsity and falls away.

[4] It has been shown above n. 434, that "Reuben," the firstborn of Jacob, signified the light of truth and thence the understanding of the Word, and thus truth from good or faith from charity, as did the apostle Peter; and that conversely, "Reuben" represented truth separated from good, or faith separated from charity, and that this faith is signified by his adultery with Bilhah his father's concubine, in consequence of which the birthright was taken away from him and given to Joseph. To this may be added, that all heresies, so far as they are adulterations and falsifications of the Word, correspond to adulteries and whoredoms of various kinds, and these because of this correspondence are actually perceived in the spiritual world from those who are in heresies. The reason of this is that marriages as they exist in the heavens derive their spiritual origin from the conjunction of good and truth; and conversely, adulteries derive their origin from the conjunction of evil and falsity; and this is why heaven is compared in the Word to a marriage, and hell to adultery. And as there is in the hells the conjunction of evil and falsity, so there continually exhales therefrom a sphere of adultery. It is for this reason that "adulteries and whoredoms" signify in the Word the adulterations of the good of the church and the falsifications of its truth (See above, n. 141, 161).

[5] In respect to faith separated from charity, this is perceived in the spiritual world as the adultery of a son with a mother as also with a step-mother. This is so because that faith shuts out the good of charity; and when this is shut out the evil of the love of self and of the world takes its place, and that faith conjoins itself with that love. For every kind of faith must necessarily conjoin itself with some love; therefore when spiritual love, which is charity, is separated, faith then conjoins itself with the love of self or with the love of the world, which are the loves that are dominant in the natural man; and this is why so heinous an adultery results from faith separated from charity. From this then it is clear what is signified by the adultery of Reuben with Bilhah his father's concubine, and why he was rejected for this reason from the right of the primogeniture. This is also meant by the prophecy of Israel his father respecting Reuben:

Reuben my firstborn, thou art my power and the beginning of my vigor; excelling in exaltation and excelling in strength; light as water, thou shalt not excel, because thou wentest up to thy father's bed, then thou didst profane it, he went up to my couch (Gen. 49:3, 4).

These words may be seen explained in the Arcana Coelestia (n. 6341-6350). That such adultery is perceived in the spiritual world from faith separated from charity has been made evident to me from correspondences in that world. For whenever I have perceived afar off the sphere of adultery with a mother or stepmother, I have known at once that those who had confirmed themselves in faith alone both in doctrine and in life were near, and they were also then discovered; and when they had been explored they were found to have been such in the world.

[6] So much respecting Reuben; we will now speak of the Philistines; these also in the Word represent faith separated from love. It was for this reason that they were called the "uncircumcised;" for "one uncircumcised" signifies one who is destitute of spiritual love, and is solely in natural love, and with that love alone no religious principle can be conjoined, much less anything of the church; for every religious principle and everything of the church has regard to the Divine, to heaven, and to spiritual life; and these cannot be conjoined with any other than a spiritual love; but not with a natural love separated from a spiritual love; since natural love separated from spiritual love is man's own [proprium], and this, regarded in itself, is nothing but evil. All the wars that the sons of Israel waged against the Philistines represented the combats of the spiritual man with the natural man, and thence also the combats of truth conjoined with good against truth separated from good, which in itself is not truth but falsity. For truth separated from good is falsified in the idea of the thought respecting it, and for the reason that there is nothing spiritual present in the thought to enlighten it. For the same reason those who are in faith separated from charity have no truth, except merely in their speech or in their preaching from the Word, the idea of truth instantly perishing as soon as truth is thought about.

[7] Because this religion exists in the churches with all who love to live a natural life, so in the land of Canaan the Philistines were not subjugated, as the other nations of that land were, and consequently there were many battles with them. For all the historical things of the Word are representative of such things as pertain to the church; and all the nations of the land of Canaan represented things heretical confirming either the falsities of faith or the evils of the love; while the sons of Israel represented the truths of faith and the goods of love, and thus the church. But what was represented by the wars that the inhabitants of the land of Canaan carried on will be told in its place and time; here it shall merely be shown that the Philistines represented a religious principle separated from spiritual good, such as is the religious principle of faith alone separated from its life, which is charity. This is why the sons of Israel whenever they fell away from the worship of Jehovah to the worship of other gods were given over to their enemies, or were conquered by them:

Thus they were given over to the Philistines, and served them eighteen years, and afterwards forty years (Judges 10;Judges 13).

This represented their departure from the worship from the good of love and the truths of faith to worship from the evils of love and the falsities of faith. Likewise:

The sons of Israel were conquered and distressed by the Philistines (1 Samuel 4; 13; 28; 29; 31).

But when the sons of Israel returned to the worship of Jehovah, which was the worship from the good of love and the truths of faith, they conquered the Philistines (1 Samuel 7, 1 Samuel 14; 2 Samuel 5; 2 Samuel 8; 21; 23; 2 Kings 18). That these historical things involve such things can be seen only from the series of things there described when viewed in the internal sense, to present which here would occupy too much time; therefore one passage only from the prophetical parts of the Word shall be cited, from which it will be manifest that such things as pertain to the church were represented by the Philistines in these narratives.

[8] Thus in Isaiah:

Rejoice not, O Philistea, all of thee, because the rod that smiteth thee is broken; for out of the serpent's root shall come forth a basilisk, whose fruit shall be a fiery-flying serpent. Then the firstborn of the poor shall feed, and the needy shall lie down in safety; and I will kill thy root with famine, and he shall slay thy remnant. Howl, O gate; cry out, O city; thou whole Philistea art dissolved; for from the north cometh a smoke, and none shall be alone in thy assemblies. What then shall one answer, ye messengers of the nation? That Jehovah hath founded Zion, and in her the afflicted of His people shall hope (Isaiah 14:29-32).

This describes Philistea, which signifies the church, or those in the church who indeed are in truths from the sense of the letter of the Word or from some other revelation, and yet are in filthy loves, consequently their truths are not living truths; and truths not living are turned into falsities when they are brought from exterior thought, which is the thought next to the speech, into interior thought, which belongs to the understanding, also when this thought considers truths in their origin, which those who are meant by "the Philistines" do not see. They do not see for the reason that while every man, even an evil man, has a faculty to understand, he has no good of the will, which is the good of life; for this good springs from love to God and from love to the neighbor, and it is these loves that cause that faculty to communicate with heaven and receive enlightenment therefrom.

[9] This chapter in Isaiah describes those who are in truths without good, and shows that with such all truths are turned into falsities. This, therefore, is the spiritual sense of these words: "Rejoice not, O Philistea, all of thee, because the rod that smiteth thee is broken," signifies that they should not rejoice because they are permitted to remain in their heresy by reason of the fewness of those who are in truths from good; "for out of the serpent's root shall come forth a basilisk" signifies that out of the sensual man a dogma destructive of all truth will arise; "the serpent's root" being the sensual, which is the ultimate of man's life, and "the basilisk" being the destruction of all truth. "Whose fruit shall be a fiery-flying serpent" signifies from which there will spring faith separated from charity; this faith is meant by "a fiery-flying serpent" because it flies upwards by means of reasonings and confirmations from things revealed that are not understood, and thus it kills the things that are living. In like manner "the basilisk" has a similar signification as "the dragon," which is also called "a serpent;" and "the fiery-flying serpent" has a similar signification as "the beast coming up out of the sea and the beast out of the earth," in this chapter of Revelation. "Then the firstborn of the poor shall feed, and the needy shall lie down in safety," signifies that when that dogma is received by those who are natural and sensual men, and who believe themselves to be wiser than others, truths from good with those who desire what is true and will what is good, will become living; "the firstborn" in the Word signify truths born from good; the "poor" those who are not in truths but who still desire them, and the "needy" those who are not in goods but who in heart will them. "And I will kill thy root with famine, and he shall slay thy remnant," signifies that all truths, from the first of them to the last, will be destroyed by falsities. "Howl, O gate; cry out, O city," signifies that no entrance will be granted to any truth, and that doctrine will be made up of mere falsities, "gate" signifying entrance to the truths of doctrine, and "city" doctrine. "Thou whole Philistea art dissolved" signifies the destruction of that church by mere falsities. "For from the north cometh a smoke" signifies that every falsity from evil will break in from hell, "the north" meaning hell, and "smoke" the falsity of evil. "And none shall be alone in thy assemblies" signifies that there shall not remain a single truth among their knowledges. "What then shall one answer, ye messengers of the nation?" signifies the enlightenment of those who are in the good of life from love to the Lord. "That Jehovah hath founded Zion" signifies that a church shall be established from them; "and in her the afflicted of His people shall hope" signifies that those who are not in wisdom from self, and who conquer in temptations against such falsities, shall have intelligence and salvation.

[10] The vastation of truth by falsities with those who are meant by "the Philistines" is also described by Jeremiah 47:1-7; likewise in Ezekiel 25:15, 16; in Joel 3:4-6; in Amos 1:8. That such falsify truths is meant by "the daughters of the Philistines," mentioned in Ezekiel 16:27, 57; also in 2 Samuel 1:20; "the daughters of the Philistines" there meaning the affections of falsity. Their religious principle was also represented by their idol called Dagon, which was set up in Ashdod, and which, according to their description, was formed like a man from the head to the navel, and like a fish from the navel downwards; its being like a man from the head to the navel represented the understanding derived from truths; and like a fish from the navel downwards represented the natural destitute of the good of love; for the lower part down to the knees corresponds to celestial love, and a "fish" signifies the natural man which is without spiritual good. (That "man" [homo] signifies the affection of truth, may be seen above, n. 280; that his "head" signifies the understanding of truth and intelligence therefrom, n. 553; that a "fish" signifies the natural man, n. 513; and that the generative organs signify from correspondence celestial love, see Arcana Coelestia 5050-5062. Moreover, the "emerods" with which the Philistines were smitten when the ark of God was held captive by them, signified truths defiled by evils of life; but these and other things related about them in 1 Samuel 5 may be seen explained above, n. 700)

[11] Truth defiled by evil of life is signified also by "the uncircumcised" (2 Samuel 1:20; Ezekiel 28:10; 31:18; 32:18, 19; 44:9). For the foreskin corresponds to corporeal love, because the member which it covers corresponds to spiritual and celestial love. And because "the Philistines" represented those who are in knowledge (scientia) and cognitions of truth without any spiritual and celestial good, they were called "uncircumcised." And as the sons of Israel were also actually of the same character, in order that they might nevertheless represent the church which is in spiritual and celestial good and in truths therefrom, it was commanded that they should be circumcised. From this it can be seen that the religious principle at this day that separates charity from faith is in the representative sense Philistea.

[12] So much respecting the Philistines. Something shall now be said about the goats and sheep, upon which judgment will be executed, according to the Lord's words in Matthew (Matthew 25:31-46 end). The common opinion is that the "goats" there mean all the evil, and it has not been known heretofore that the "goats" there mean those who are in faith separated from charity, and the "sheep" those who are in faith from charity. In a good sense "goats" mean those who are in natural good and in truths therefrom, which truths are called the knowledges (cognitiones) of truth and good from the natural sense of the Word. Such as these, or such good and such truth therefrom, are signified by the goats that were sacrificed. That there were also sacrifices of goats is evident from Leviticus 4:23; 9:2-4, 8-23; 16:2-20; 23:18, 19; Numbers 15:22-29; 28:11-15, 28:18-31; 29:1; and elsewhere. For all the beasts that were offered as sacrifices signified such things as pertain to the church, all of which have reference to goods and truths. The celestial goods and the truths therefrom in which are the angels in the third heaven were signified by "lambs," while the spiritual goods and truths in which are the angels in the middle heaven were signified by "rams," and the natural goods and truths therefrom, in which are the angels who are in the lowest heaven, were signified by "goats." Celestial goods and truths are with those who are in love to the Lord; but spiritual goods and truths are with those who are in love towards the neighbor; and natural goods and truths with those who live well according to truths from natural affection. This is the signification of these three kinds of beasts in various parts of the Word (as in Ezekiel 27:21; Deuteronomy 32:14).

[13] But as most things in the Word have also a contrary sense, so "goats" signify in that sense those who are in faith separated from charity, for the reason that they are more lascivious than other animals, and that they signify in the genuine sense those who are in natural good and the truth thence, and all who are in faith separated from charity both in doctrine and in life are merely natural. That such are meant in the Word by "goats" has been shown me to the life in the spiritual world. There various beasts are seen; but they are not such beasts as exist in our world, that is, not beasts that have been born, but they are correspondences of the affections and of the thoughts therefrom of spirits and angels; consequently as soon as those affections and the thoughts therefrom vary and cease, these beasts vanish out of sight. That I might know that those who are in faith separated from charity, or rather the affections and thoughts of such from their faith, are represented by "goats," it was granted me to see some of those spirits; and they appeared before my eyes and the eyes of many others altogether as goats with horns. Moreover, when rams and sheep were sent among them these goats being kindled with anger rushed upon them, and strove to throw them down, but in vain. For in the spiritual world goats have no power against the rams or sheep, therefore the goats were overcome. Afterwards it was granted me to see the same as men; and this was a proof that the goats were identical with those who had lived in the world in faith separated from charity.

[14] From this what is signified by the "ram" and the "he-goat," and "the battle between them," in the eighth chapter of Daniel can be seen, namely, that the "ram" there means those who are in faith from charity, and the "he-goat" those who are in faith separated from charity. Thus the future state of the church is there described, namely, that faith separate would dissipate all charity, which is the good of life, and falsity therefrom would have rule in the Christian world. To illustrate this, I will present a summary of what is related in Daniel respecting the ram and the he-goat, as follows:

Daniel saw in vision a ram that had two horns, one higher than the other, but the higher came up last; and he made himself great. But then a he-goat of the goats came from the west over the faces of all the earth; and he charged upon the ram and smote him, and broke his two horns; and he cast the ram down to the earth, and trampled upon him. The he-goat had a horn between his eyes, and when this was broken there came up four horns in its place towards the four winds of the heavens; and out of one of them came forth one horn which grew exceedingly, even to the host of the heavens, and cast down some of the host and of the stars to the earth and trampled upon them. Yea, it exalted itself even to the prince of the host, and the continual burnt-offering was taken away from him, and the dwelling-place of his sanctuary was cast down; and it cast down the truth to the earth (Daniel 8:1-14, seq.).

That the "ram" here means those who are in faith from charity, and the "he-goat" those who are in faith separated from charity, may be seen above (n. 316 and n. 573, where the same things are explained; therefore I pass by any further explanation.

[15] Again that "he-goats" mean those who are in faith separated from charity, and "rams" those who are in faith from charity, is evident also in Ezekiel:

And as for you, O my flock, behold I judge between cattle and cattle, and between rams and he-goats (Ezekiel 34:17).

Likewise in Zechariah:

Mine anger was kindled against the shepherds, and I will visit upon the he-goats (Zechariah 10:3).

From this it can be seen that the goats and the sheep in Matthew (25:31-46 to the end) have the same meaning; consequently works of charity only are there enumerated which were done by the sheep, and were not done by the goats. That such are there meant by the "goats" was proved also when the Last Judgment was accomplished upon those who belonged to the Christian Church; for then all those who were in faith separated from charity both in doctrine and life were cast into hell; and all who were in faith from charity were kept safe.